Obama’s Cracker Jack’d Healthcare Plan

http://theblacksphere.net/2013/10/obamas-cracker-jackd-healthcare-plan/

Cracker-HiJacked-Obamacare
Obamacare Hi-Jacked Our Wallet

OBAMACARE: A piece of legislation so magical and mysterious that, as Nancy Pelosi so eloquently put it, “we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what’s in it….”

Imagine the mainstream medias’ surprise!
When I was a small boy my mother would bring home one of my favorite snacks — Cracker Jacks! Popcorn and peanuts smothered in gooey caramel-flavored sugar. Sweeter than a molasses-covered ice-cream cone. They were absolutely delicious!
But what was even more special than all that chewy-goodness were those three little words emblazoned on the outside of the box: “Toy Surprise Inside!” Sometimes I’d discover a little toy gun and play cops and robbers with my brothers. Next time I’d find a miniature car I could zoom around the living room. And what’s more, it was free! FREE I TELL YOU!!!
Then one day a terrible, horrible, awful thing happened. Mom brought home a box for me and set it on the coffee table. As usual, I anxiously dumped some of it out on the floor (this was so I could dig around and claim my prize…forget the crunchy popcorn). The only thing in the box besides the popcorn and peanuts was a tiny envelope.
Tossing the envelope aside, I dug deep to the bottom of the box thinking by some horrible twist of fate, someone forgot the prize. Or maybe some Cracker Jack packer STOLE my surprise!
That’s when it happened. The day my innocence was lost. I slowly took the small, crisp square in my hands and read the words on the paper, “Surprise Inside!” Reluctantly, I pulled it open. Inside was a piece of paper with a slit on either end with these instructions;

“To use your pencil topper, just detach the prize and insert a pencil through the slits as shown below.”

This was no toy! I’d been duped! Heck…they’d apparently even duped my mother!!!

Dateline: March 23, 2010

The headlines read, “FREE HEALTHCARE FOR AMERICANS!”
It was shouted from the rooftops by the Administration and media organizations. The healthcare-savior had arrived! The Affordable Care Act would give millions coverage they had not been able to afford, and would allow those who didn’t need it to keep their own plans.

Repeatedly and with the fervor and enthusiasm of a Baptist minister, Barack Obama declared: 

“if you like your health plan, you will be able to keep your health plan,”

And MILLIONS of Americans believed him. Believed him to the point that he won reelection in 2012.

Over this past weekend true Obama believers have been stunned with the news from no less than CBS and NBC, all the way to the much-despised Fox News, that they have been lied to. That the silver-tongued savior led them down the primrose path of healthcare redemption. That what they had been buying since 2009 was being delivered to their very own mailboxes in a big-ol’ sack of excrement.
As Obamacare proponents’ cries of “I was all for free healthcare until I knew I was paying for it” ring through the rafters, I can’t help but laugh hard and long.
Yes, I’m sure it will affect my family the same as theirs. But the irony of being a small boy and realizing there was no “free” toy inside, compared with these post-pubescent adolescents just now grasping it for the first time somehow comforts me.

Mostly because I think maybe, just maybe, these toddlers sucking on the thumb of big Government may finally be waking up to the fact it’s time to take their first baby-steps to maturity. Nah.


Read more at http://theblacksphere.net/2013/10/obamas-cracker-jackd-healthcare-plan/#a5Q0s3TaCT0ppdQs.99

Former Guantanamo detainee was on ground in Benghazi during terror attack, source says

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/10/25/former-guantanamo-detainee-was-on-ground-in-benghazi-night-11-attack/

Former Guantanamo detainee was on ground in Benghazi during terror attack, source says

A former Guantanamo Bay detainee with Al Qaeda ties was in Benghazi the night of the Sept. 11 attack, according to a source on the ground in Libya. 
The source told Fox News that ex-detainee Sufian bin Qumu, who is suspected of running camps in eastern Libya where some of the assailants trained, is also a “respected member” of Ansar al-Sharia — one of the Islamist groups identified in State Department email traffic two hours after the attack.  
Two sources familiar with the investigation, when asked about bin Qumu’s whereabouts the night of the attack, did not dispute the claim he was in Benghazi. 
While it is not clear whether bin Qumu was directing the assault, his security file from Guantanamo may be revealing. Having already trained in Usama bin Laden’s camps, in 1998 bin Qumu joined the Taliban in Pakistan and “communicated with likely extremist elements via radio during this period indicating a position of leadership,” the file shows. 
Fox News’ ongoing reporting on the attack has shown that at least four key Benghazi suspects have ties to the Al Qaeda senior leadership in Pakistan. They include bin Qumu and Muhammad Jamal, whose network is also suspected of training jihadists for the attack. Jamal was held, and later released by, Egyptian authorities. Earlier this month, the State Department’s terrorist designation for Jamal and his network cites letters he exchanged with Al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri, where Jamal asked for money and explained the scope of his training camps, which included Libya and the Sinai. 
Fox News was first to report that two other suspects have ties to the Al Qaeda senior leadership — one believed to be a former courier and the other, a bodyguard for the network. Faraj al Chalabi, identified to Fox News as the bodyguard, was also in Afghanistan with bin Laden until the U.S. invasion in October 2001.
The hunt is still underway for suspects in the attack more than a year later, though some have questioned the administration’s resolve.  
After Fox News reported earlier this week that the Benghazi suspects are not included on the State Department’s “Rewards for Justice” program, which offers cash for tips that lead to suspected terrorists, Republican Rep. Michael McCaul, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, wrote to Secretary of State John Kerry questioning the omission.
The letter is now being circulated on Capitol Hill for signatures, Fox News has learned, and should be delivered to Kerry’s office no later than next week. 
A draft reviewed by Fox News includes highly critical language. “We fail to understand how such an important counterterrorism tool could not be used by the administration, when you and the president claim that bringing the assailants to justice is such a high priority,” the draft says.
Bin Qumu was transferred to Guantanamo on May 5, 2002, and released to Libya on Sept. 28, 2007, where he was initially held and later released. His Guantanamo review file, originally a classified document but made public by WikiLeaks, says he is a “former member of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), a probable member of al Qaida and a member of the North African Extremist Network. Detainee is a medium to high risk and he is likely to pose a threat to the US and it’s interests and allies.”
A review of State Department cables, also made public by WikiLeaks, shows that former Ambassador Chris Stevens, who was killed in the 2012 attack, was interested in bin Qumu’s fate once he was transferred from the U.S. military detention facility to Libya. Stevens had one of his subordinates meet with bin Qumu at the Libyan jail.
Before he was promoted to U.S. ambassador to Libya in May 2012, Stevens served as CDA, or “Charge de Affairs,” at the embassy in Tripoli. In 2008 cables, Stevens noted that he and his team from the politics and economic section of the embassy were visiting prisons to ensure the welfare of repatriated Guantanamo detainees from Libya. This included bin Qumu, who is referred to as ISN 557 in the cables dated from September 2008.  
One cable says: “During our previous meeting on June 10, the security official who facilitated the meeting explained that detention protocols for extremists and terrorists mandate that they be held in solitary detention to preclude the possibility that they could recruit other members of the prison population. End note.”
Former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton noted to Fox News that “as we returned Gitmo inmates to Libya to be imprisoned by Muammar Qaddafi, the U.S. government was tasked with officially inquiring about their welfare in Libyan prisons.”  
Fox News’ Bret Baier was first to report last fall that the intelligence community believed the former detainee was involved in the Benghazi terrorist attack. 
Representatives with the CIA and National Counterterrorism Center declined to comment for this report. The FBI did not respond.

GOP Congressman Decimates Andrea Mitchell and Slams ‘Pathetic News Reporting’

GOP Congressman Decimates Andrea Mitchell and Slams ‘Pathetic News Reporting’

Kyle Drennen's picture
[***UPDATED*** 17:30 ET: More analysis and full transcript added]
Appearing on Andrea Mitchell’s MSNBC 1 p.m. ET hour show on Tuesday, Wisconsin Congressman Sean Duffy slammed the press for not doing its job in pointing out the hypocrisy of ObamaCare being delayed for certain groups but not for all Americans: “…the media won’t even ask the question about, ‘Why are you [the Obama administration] treating families different than big businesses?’…That’s how pathetic, I think, news reporting has become, when we won’t ask tough questions to the administration.” [Listen to the audio or watch the video after the jump]

That response was prompted by Mitchell ranting that Republican calls for a one-year delay of the ObamaCare individual mandate was a “non-negotiable demand.” Moments later, after Duffy explained that the GOP has “been incredibly reasonable, making a small ask,” Mitchell was aghast: “Do you consider it a small ask that he [Obama] get rid of the central part of his health care plan that was upheld by a – by the vote of a presidential election, and the United States Supreme Court.” Duffy replied: “Andrea, hold on. That’s your spin.” Mitchell laughably asserted: “That’s not spin.”

Duffy pointed out what a joke media coverage of ObamaCare had become:
You need Jon Stewart on Comedy Central to ask [Health and Human Services] Secretary [Kathleen] Sebelius, ‘Hey, why won’t you treat these two equally?’ And she can’t answer it….’Why do you want your own health care and you won’t join us in ObamaCare?’ That question I haven’t seen anybody ask on MSNBC. Please ask it, because they don’t have a good answer for it.
Mitchell argued: “Well, we’ve asked questions to both sides. That’s not fair. We have asked the question…”

In reality, no such question was ever put to Sebelius in an interview with MSNBC host Rachel Maddow on Monday. In addition, the question was left out of an NBC interview with the Health and Human Services Secretary on September 30. 

Perhaps realizing that fact, Mitchell was forced cite Sebelius on The Daily Show: “Well, I think the response would be – the response that Kathleen Sebelius gave to Jon Stewart was, ‘If we had gotten what we wanted, which was a single-payer plan, this wouldn’t be the problem.'” Duffy noted: “That’s right, you say, ‘I think this is what they would say,’ but you don’t know what they would say because you haven’t asked.”

Wrapping up the segment, Duffy reiterated: “We’re just saying treat individuals and families like big business and have Obama go into ObamaCare. That’s it. No one asked that question but Jon Stewart. I think the media should start doing its job.”

Mitchell snidely remarked: “Thanks for your advice.”

Here is a full transcript of the October 8 interview:
1:07PM ET
ANDREA MITCHELL So what do lawmakers say? How do they justify continuing the standoff? One of those five service members killed [in Afghanistan during the government shutdown], as we’ve reported, was from Wisconsin, and joining me now is Wisconsin Republican Congressman Sean Duffy, a member of the House committee on the budget. Congressman, I’m not ascribing blame any place, other than to the entire system here. How do you respond to the mother of Corporal Collins?

REP. SEAN DUFFY [R-WI]: First off, my heart and prayers go out to the families who have lost loved ones in battle and I’m so grateful for the ultimate sacrifice these young individuals have made on behalf of our country. As we’ve talked this morning, we are going to work through this week, a mini C.R. that would help with this funding [for death benefits to families of fallen soldiers]. Duncan Hunter, as you mentioned, had indicated that this is in the discretion of the government. If they disagree, we will work this week to make sure-

MITCHELL: The Pentagon disagrees with that.

DUFFY: Right. So if they disagree, we’ll work through a mini C.R. that will take care of these families who have lost loved ones. That is not the intent of this shutdown.

MITCHELL: But I mean the larger point, though, Congressman Duffy, is these mini C.R.s, mini continuing resolutions, that’s the whole question of, you know, taking little pieces of the government. The issue is not that this is a small matter, it’s a very big matter, but so is the matter of the kids in Head Start. So is the problem of the single moms who aren’t getting food stamps and aren’t getting their help. You know, so down the road are the survivor’s benefits, and that fund is going to run out in weeks, if not months.

So you can’t take this piecemeal, Congressman. You know, isn’t the issue that someone has to sit down and figure out what to do about the stalemate that has led to this disgrace?

DUFFY: Well, you hit the nail on the head. I mean and the President has said, “I won’t sit at the table.” Harry Reid said, I won’t negotiate.”

MITCHELL: Well, he – no. He said to the Speaker today on the phone, according to the White House-

DUFFY: “I won’t negotiate.”

MITCHELL: He said that he will negotiate, and negotiate a lot of things that you all want – tax reform, entitlements – that he will negotiate once the threat of the government shutdown and of the debt default is not hanging over their heads. That’s what he says.

DUFFY: Andrea, that’s ridiculous. And I don’t know – I mean I think you said you’ve been through 18 shutdowns.

MITCHELL: Yeah.

DUFFY: I don’t know if you’ve seen a president that has come and said, “I’m not going to negotiate.” I mean this is historic, that a president says, “I’m not going to sit at the table.” As a guy that’s the 10th of 11 kids, families work through problems by talking and communicating, so to does the government.

And you’re well aware that all we’ve asked for is that the President and the administration join us in ObamaCare, the American people and Congress, and that individuals and families be treated just like big business. That’s what they’re holding out for and I think – I mean even this morning-

MITCHELL: Congressman, you’re asking him – that’s a non-negotiable demand. Why not sit down and negotiate over entitlement reform, which is something that you all have been demanding and that he has offered in his initial budget? You’re putting on the table a non-negotiable demand.

DUFFY: Listen, Andrea – listen, is it non-negotiable that he’s not gonna enter ObamaCare? And he’s gonna say, “I get my gold-plated health care plan but I want members of Congress and the rest of America to be in ObamaCare.” That’s non-negotiable? Come on. That’s not reasonable.

I mean, one issue we have is the media won’t even ask the question about, “Why are you treating families different than big businesses?” You need Jon Stewart on Comedy Central to ask Secretary Sebelius, “Hey, why won’t you treat these two equally?” And she can’t answer it. I mean, that’s how pathetic I think news reporting has become, when we won’t ask tough questions to the administration.

MITCHELL: Well, we’ve asked questions to both sides. That’s not fair.

DUFFY: Do you ask that question, Andrea? Ask the question.

MITCHELL: We have asked the question, and the basic point is that-

DUFFY: “Why do you want your own health care and you won’t join us in ObamaCare?” That question I haven’t seen anybody ask on MSNBC. Please ask it, because they don’t have a good answer for it. But in regard to actually-

MITCHELL: Well, I think the response would be – the response that Kathleen Sebelius gave to Jon Stewart was, “If we had gotten what we wanted, which was a single-payer plan, this wouldn’t be the problem.”

DUFFY: That’s right, you say, “I think this is what they would say,” but you don’t know what they would say because you haven’t asked. And that’s one of the problems we have here.

But I think in regard to negotiating issues, Andrea, I think we can sit at the table and go, “Okay, well, if these ones are off the table, what is on the table, Mr. President, as we move towards the debt limit negotiation?” And he would say, “Well, lets talk. Maybe it’s going to be entitlement reform, maybe it’s tax reform.” We’ll have all those conversations. But when he says, “You have to give me what I want, I’m not going to talk to you,” I think America looks at that and goes, “I understand there was divided government, people are hard on both sides, but I expect them to talk to each other and work through their differences and make it work.” And that’s not happening now, Andrea.

MITCHELL: Congressman, this is about – with all due respect, this is about military death benefits to kids, to 19-year-old kids who have died in Afghanistan and who are not returning home. This is about what their families are entitled to by law and what they are not getting.

DUFFY: And I just told you that we’re gonna move-

MITCHELL: This is not about what you want on ObamaCare and it’s not what the President wants on the debt ceiling.

DUFFY: Don’t spin that on me. I just told you at the top of our segment that we’re gonna pass a mini C.R. to address those benefits. We’re going to look out for our military, especially those families who have made the ultimate sacrifice. We are gonna do that and we’re gonna do it this week.

So you were asking me about the larger issue of why can’t people resolve this government shutdown. And we have been incredibly reasonable, making a small ask. And if the President doesn’t like what we-

MITCHELL: Do you consider it a small ask that he get rid of the central part of his health care plan that was upheld by a – by the vote of a presidential election and the United States Supreme Court?

DUFFY: Andrea, hold on. That’s your spin.

MITCHELL: That’s not spin.

DUFFY: The President gave a one-year exemption for – listen, he gave a one-year exemption for businesses in regard to taxes and penalties on ObamaCare. Everyone still can go into the exchange if they want, but they’re not penalized in big business if they don’t go in. We’ve said for the individuals, for the families, if they want to go into ObamaCare they can. But if they don’t, for one year don’t tax them or penalize them, just like the way your treating big businesses. That is fair under the law. That’s all we’ve asked for.

He’s won the debate, Andrea. The exchanges are up and kind of running. There’s subsidies out there. This is a small ask on equity and equality under the law for individuals and families, just like big business. And why won’t he join us in ObamaCare? Why wasn’t Michelle Obama on October 1st at the computer with her family signing up for ObamaCare? Or Jay Carney? They have their own gold-plated health care plan that they’re in and they don’t-

MITCHELL: So do you.

DUFFY: No I’m not, I’m in ObamaCare. I’m in ObamaCare, Andrea. All members of Congress are, and my family. The President should join us in ObamaCare, and the rest of America. Is that pretty reasonable?  We should all be treated equally under the law? Why should members of Congress be in ObamaCare and not the President? Explain that one. Isn’t that fair?

[LONG PAUSE]

MITCHELL: I think that the-

DUFFY: Can you defend that? Can you defend why the President shouldn’t be in ObamaCare like members of Congress and their staffs?

MITCHELL: I can’t defend why…

DUFFY: Then you should ask that question to him.

MITCHELL: …Congress and the White House cannot figure out a way to reopen the government…

DUFFY: Then ask them that question, Andrea.

MITCHELL: …so that our kids and their families can get the benefits that they have been-

DUFFY: Listen, and I’ve told you that we’re gonna do that this week. But I want your viewers to know that this has been a reasonable approach by – on our part to go, “Everyone equal under the law, the President and Congress in ObamaCare.” If it’s good for America, it’s good enough for the people who passed the law. And individuals for one week – for one year being treated like big business who came to this hill with their lobbyist and got an exemption to the taxes and requirements of ObamaCare. Give that same treatment to the families in America.

And again, this has nothing to do with the exchanges being open or the subsidies in the exchanges. We’re not having any impact on those. They get to stand up and run. We’re just saying treat individuals and families like big business and have Obama go into ObamaCare. That’s it. No one asked that question but Jon Stewart. I think the media should start doing its job.

MITCHELL: Thanks for your advice. Thank you, Congressman.

DUFFY: Thank you.

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/kyle-drennen/2013/10/08/gop-congressman-decimates-andrea-mitchell-and-slams-pathetic-news-repo#ixzz2hEwd2CT0